Author summary
â 1% 1 analyzed article/video 4,563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Schmitt results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 1.4% saturation with 188 hits . Analysis detected 818 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of â 1% (9,010 of 9,038 authors). This Michael Schmitt is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Michael Schmitt
Author details
Total words: 13,689
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 0.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst