Author summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 1,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nudhara Yusuf results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 160 hits . Analysis detected 1,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (8,836 of 9,024 authors). This Nudhara Yusuf is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Nudhara Yusuf
Author details
Total words: 6,260
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst