Publication summary
56% 12 analyzed articles/videos 10,768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Barbed Wire results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 4,021 hits . Analysis detected 32,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,450 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (298 of 556 publications). This The Barbed Wire is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 43,450
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score12 analyzed articles43.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst