Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mario Leal results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 378 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,783 authors). This Mario Leal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mario Leal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Mario Leal (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 378
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles378 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.9%7.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos