Author summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candi Bolden results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 2,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,141 of 8,783 authors). This Candi Bolden is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Candi Bolden
Author details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% No True Scotsman: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst