šŸ—£ļøTheĀ TexansĀ WhoĀ RefusedĀ ToĀ ShutĀ Up ⁠52%

By Brian Gaar⁠28%

5/28/2026, 2:57:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 910 faulty-reasoning hits from 328 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,334 of 27,443 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the article peer group.

HowdyĀ y’all,Ā it’sĀ BrianĀ GaarĀ again,Ā seniorĀ editorĀ ofĀ TheĀ BarbedĀ WireĀ .Ā 
ThisĀ week’sĀ storiesĀ areĀ aboutĀ theĀ TexansĀ whoĀ builtĀ communities,Ā whetherĀ thatĀ meantĀ openingĀ Black-ownedĀ bookstoresĀ duringĀ aĀ racialĀ reckoningĀ orĀ organizingĀ queerĀ mutualĀ aidĀ inĀ Dallas,Ā decadesĀ beforeĀ Stonewall.Ā 
TurnsĀ outĀ theĀ mostĀ dangerousĀ thingĀ inĀ TexasĀ hasĀ alwaysĀ beenĀ aĀ groupĀ ofĀ peopleĀ readingĀ together.Ā 
FortĀ WorthĀ sistersĀ DonnaĀ andĀ DonyaĀ CraddockĀ calledĀ 2020Ā ā€œtheĀ unicornĀ year.ā€Ā 
AfterĀ GeorgeĀ Floyd’sĀ murderĀ sparkedĀ nationwideĀ protestsĀ andĀ conversationsĀ aboutĀ race,Ā theirĀ store,Ā TheĀ DockĀ BookĀ Shop,Ā becameĀ aĀ gatheringĀ placeĀ whereĀ peopleĀ cameĀ toĀ talk,Ā learn,Ā andĀ listenĀ .Ā 
ForĀ aĀ briefĀ period,Ā Black-ownedĀ bookstoresĀ acrossĀ theĀ countryĀ sawĀ salesĀ andĀ attentionĀ theyĀ hadn’tĀ seenĀ inĀ years.Ā 
ButĀ theĀ surgeĀ didn’tĀ last.Ā 
TheĀ storyĀ tracesĀ howĀ Black-ownedĀ bookstoresĀ inĀ TexasĀ stillĀ faceĀ harassment,Ā closures,Ā vandalism,Ā andĀ financialĀ strugglesĀ evenĀ asĀ theyĀ continueĀ servingĀ asĀ communityĀ spaces,Ā eventĀ hubs,Ā andĀ inĀ someĀ casesĀ evenĀ warmingĀ centersĀ duringĀ winterĀ storms.Ā 
AsĀ authorĀ CharĀ AdamsĀ putĀ it,Ā Black-ownedĀ bookstoresĀ areĀ ā€œrevolutionaryā€Ā inĀ aĀ countryĀ whereĀ BlackĀ peopleĀ wereĀ onceĀ ā€œbeatenĀ andĀ killedĀ forĀ attemptingĀ toĀ read.ā€Ā 
AndĀ longĀ beforeĀ StonewallĀ becameĀ shorthandĀ forĀ LGBTQ+Ā resistance,Ā DallasĀ hadĀ itsĀ ownĀ queerĀ organizingĀ movementĀ quietlyĀ operatingĀ inĀ theĀ middleĀ ofĀ conservativeĀ Texas.Ā 
HistorianĀ M.Ā 
RhysĀ Dotson’sĀ newĀ book,Ā ā€œTheĀ DallasĀ Way,ā€Ā exploresĀ howĀ earlyĀ activistsĀ builtĀ networks,Ā protectedĀ eachĀ otherĀ fromĀ policeĀ raids,Ā andĀ organizedĀ throughĀ churches,Ā newsletters,Ā andĀ carefullyĀ managedĀ publicĀ events.Ā 
YearsĀ BeforeĀ theĀ StonewallĀ Riots,Ā Dallas’ QueerĀ CommunityĀ HadĀ ItsĀ OwnĀ MovementĀ 
TheĀ storyĀ alsoĀ highlightsĀ howĀ AIDSĀ activistsĀ inĀ theĀ 1980sĀ forcedĀ DallasĀ politiciansĀ toĀ respondĀ duringĀ theĀ heightĀ ofĀ theĀ epidemic,Ā includingĀ aĀ protestĀ whereĀ activistsĀ turnedĀ aĀ vacantĀ lotĀ intoĀ aĀ mockĀ graveyardĀ afterĀ theĀ cityĀ spentĀ moreĀ moneyĀ fillingĀ aĀ constructionĀ holeĀ thanĀ fightingĀ AIDS.Ā 
It’sĀ aĀ reminderĀ thatĀ TexasĀ historyĀ isĀ fullĀ ofĀ peopleĀ whoĀ survivedĀ notĀ becauseĀ institutionsĀ protectedĀ them,Ā butĀ becauseĀ communitiesĀ did.Ā 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.3%Brian Gaar: 2.1%The Barbed Wire: 2.9%Confirmation Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.1%Brian Gaar: 3.4%The Barbed Wire: 3.1%Availability Heuristic20.1%This article: 5.2%Brian Gaar: 1.0%The Barbed Wire: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.1%Brian Gaar: 4.2%The Barbed Wire: 5.8%Framing Effect20.1%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Brian Gaar: 1.0%The Barbed Wire: 1.5%Pessimism Bias6.7%This article: 33.8%Brian Gaar: 9.0%The Barbed Wire: 9.3%Negativity Bias33.8%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.8%The Barbed Wire: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Brian Gaar: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 1.7%In-Group Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Brian Gaar: 1.3%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 7.3%Brian Gaar: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 0.4%Primacy Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 1.1%The Barbed Wire: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.8%Brian Gaar: 2.0%The Barbed Wire: 1.8%Appeal to Authority8.8%This article: 5.2%Brian Gaar: 0.5%The Barbed Wire: 1.0%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 31.7%Brian Gaar: 3.3%The Barbed Wire: 4.4%Hasty Generalization31.7%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Brian Gaar: 2.9%The Barbed Wire: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.5%Brian Gaar: 1.5%The Barbed Wire: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.5%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 32.6%Brian Gaar: 2.0%The Barbed Wire: 3.9%Anecdotal32.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.8%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.8%Brian Gaar: 4.5%The Barbed Wire: 2.2%Unattributed Quote16.8%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 22.6%Brian Gaar: 9.9%The Barbed Wire: 7.4%Biased Writer Voice22.6%This article: 6.4%Brian Gaar: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 2.1%Indoctrination6.4%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.7%The Barbed Wire: 3.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Gaar: 0.7%The Barbed Wire: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

328 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech274writer words
Selected voice

Rhys Dotson

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words54% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+83.6 ptsWriter: 16.4%Rhys Dotson: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-10.9 ptsWriter: 10.9%Rhys Dotson: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Rhys Dotson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.