Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,047 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bookstores results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 7,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,141 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,740 of 16,562 topics). This Bookstores is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Bookstores
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,141
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.3%18.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.1%17.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.8%17.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos