Ken Paxton, ‘Champion for the Unborn,’ Would Have Let Our Babies Die. We Know Firsthand. 72%

By Lauren Miller13%

5/29/2026, 1:01:57 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,043 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (7,853 of 27,353 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the article peer group.

In March 2023, we became two of the first women to sue Texas over its abortion bans. 
While pregnant with twins, we’d each learned that one of our twins had severe complications that were threatening the lives of the other  and our own. 
Yet, we were denied potentially live-saving abortions. 
So we asked the state a simple question: How dead did we have to be to receive healthcare that could save our viable babies and our own lives? 
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called us “woke” for daring to ask such a question. 
After Paxton defeated U.S. 
Sen. 
John Cornyn in the Republican primary this week, we felt compelled to share the grisly reality behind that question. 
Ashley’s daughter, Isla, was diagnosed with acrania , an always-fatal condition in which the skull never forms. 
On the ultrasound, Ashley and her husband, Marcus, could see their daughter’s brain matter flowing out of her skull. 
Every day Isla kept growing, the amniotic fluid broke down more of her brain tissue  and put her twin sister, Marley, in greater danger. 
Ashley’s risk of miscarriage and premature labor was high, which meant she stood to lose both babies. 
Marley might survive if born early, but only after months in intensive care, if she lived at all. 
Lauren’s son, Thomas, was diagnosed with Trisomy 18 , a genetic disorder that ravages every organ in the body. 
Half of where his brain should have been was nothing but fluid, swelling his skull outward. 
From 12 weeks to the end of pregnancy, Trisomy 18 results in miscarriage in nearly three of every four pregnancies. 
The doctors, specialists, and genetic counselors all agreed: Every day Thomas kept growing, he put his healthy twin brother, Henry, and Lauren herself at greater risk. 
And Lauren was already gravely sick, vomiting as many as 20 times an hour. 
On another emergency room visit, she learned she was heading toward organ failure  but still not near death enough for an abortion that would save her health and Henry’s life. 
All her doctors could say was, “I’m so sorry.” 
Marley Brandt and Henry Miller are survivors of Texas’ abortion ban and Ken Paxton’s overreach to prevent Texas families from making the right decision for their family. 
Credit: Courtesy of Lauren Miller & Ashley Brandt. 
We were the lucky ones. 
We had the money, the time, and the childcare to make the trip to Colorado for the care Texas denied us. 
There, we each had a single fetal reduction, a procedure that terminates one pregnancy in the case of multiple pregnancies, which has been found to reduce preterm birth and pregnancy complications without increasing pregnancy loss. 
Two of our co-plaintiffs, Amanda Zurawski and Kristen Anaya, were not so lucky: they went septic waiting to find out whether they were dead enough for an abortion, after their water broke far too early for their daughters to survive. 
Texas lawmakers pioneered the “vigilante” civil enforcement mechanism that first got around legal protections for abortion while Roe v. 
Wade was precedent. 
The passage of Senate Bill 8 in 2021, which bans physicians from performing abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected, made Texas the most restrictive state on abortion in the country  and the state to watch . 
Last year, Texas passed House Bill 7 , essentially replicating the bounty hunter law, this time for abortion medication like mifepristone and misoprostol. 
These are the laws that Paxton promotes. 
There are exceptions for certain anomalies, which passed in May 2025 after a bipartisan effort to help clean up the mess of Texas’ abortion and was signed into law as Senate Bill 31 , or the Life of the Mother Act . 
The bill aligns language among the state’s myriad abortion laws and codifies court rulings, as well as requiring education for both doctors and lawyers on the law’s nuances. 
However, it doesn’t expand abortion access or make any exceptions for rape, incest, teen pregnancies and fatal fetal abnormalities. 
In plain language, Paxton said we weren’t dead enough for an abortion  that our doctors were right to deny us care. 
Then he turned around and said we should sue those same doctors for denying us care. 
Never mind that in Lauren’s case, her doctor was Dr. 
Austin Denard, a co-plaintiff asking the same question: How dead do we need to be? 
Paxton never answered that question. 
Everything he has done since tells us his answer: He wants Texas women closer to dead. 
When our friend, Kate Cox, asked the courts for an abortion in the middle of a medical emergency  an unviable pregnancy threatening her future fertility  a judge sided with her. 
Paxton’s response was to threaten every hospital in the Houston area where her doctor had admitting privileges with civil and criminal charges. 
The court had spoken. 
But Paxton  indicted, impeached, and divorced by his wife on “Biblical grounds”  brought it to the Texas Supreme Court , which ruled that Kate Cox didn’t qualify for an exemption. 
Paxton has demonstrated that he does not believe in your right to make decisions for your own family. 
We know, first-hand, that he does not believe in your right to protect a healthy, wanted baby. 
That he does not believe the law applies to him. 
That he is too dangerous to represent Texas. 
Maybe you think this could never happen to you. 
Neither did we. 
Every one of these stories began with a wanted pregnancy and a family trying to do right by the people they love. 
If you have ever wondered whether your vote could matter, let us be clear: for the mother of your children, for a wanted pregnancy, for anyone you would carry into an emergency room, your vote for the Texas’ next senator is a matter of life and death. 
We watched Paxton dismiss our lives and the lives of our children. 
Don’t give him the chance to do it to your family, too. 
Editor’s note: The views and opinions presented by guest contributors to The Barbed Wire do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the company, the newsroom, its staff, advisers, or advertisers. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Lauren Miller: 1.0%The Barbed Wire: 2.9%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.2%Lauren Miller: 2.6%The Barbed Wire: 3.1%Availability Heuristic16.2%This article: 5.8%Lauren Miller: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 3.4%Lauren Miller: 0.7%The Barbed Wire: 0.2%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 2.9%Lauren Miller: 0.8%The Barbed Wire: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 14.5%Lauren Miller: 3.6%The Barbed Wire: 5.8%Framing Effect14.5%This article: 4.5%Lauren Miller: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 0.5%Loss Aversion4.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Lauren Miller: 1.0%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Optimism Bias4.0%This article: 4.2%Lauren Miller: 0.5%The Barbed Wire: 1.5%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 28.7%Lauren Miller: 3.7%The Barbed Wire: 9.3%Negativity Bias28.7%This article: 0.5%Lauren Miller: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.5%This article: 4.0%Lauren Miller: 0.6%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Lauren Miller: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Lauren Miller: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 0.8%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%Lauren Miller: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Recency Bias0.8%This article: 1.6%Lauren Miller: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.9%Lauren Miller: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.9%This article: 9.1%Lauren Miller: 1.5%The Barbed Wire: 1.3%Ad Hominem9.1%This article: 2.2%Lauren Miller: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 0.4%Straw Man2.2%This article: 8.1%Lauren Miller: 1.9%The Barbed Wire: 1.8%Appeal to Authority8.1%This article: 13.4%Lauren Miller: 1.5%The Barbed Wire: 1.0%False Dilemma13.4%This article: 5.4%Lauren Miller: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.4%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.7%Lauren Miller: 2.1%The Barbed Wire: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.7%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.8%Lauren Miller: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.3%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 18.3%Lauren Miller: 5.4%The Barbed Wire: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion18.3%This article: 5.5%Lauren Miller: 0.3%The Barbed Wire: 0.9%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 9.5%Lauren Miller: 1.0%The Barbed Wire: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.5%This article: 1.5%Lauren Miller: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.5%This article: 5.0%Lauren Miller: 0.4%The Barbed Wire: 0.6%Burden of Proof5.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.1%Lauren Miller: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.3%Composition/Division2.1%This article: 31.2%Lauren Miller: 2.8%The Barbed Wire: 3.9%Anecdotal31.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.8%Lauren Miller: 0.9%The Barbed Wire: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.6%Lauren Miller: 0.7%The Barbed Wire: 2.2%Unattributed Quote7.6%This article: 2.1%Lauren Miller: 0.1%The Barbed Wire: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 13.0%Lauren Miller: 2.0%The Barbed Wire: 7.4%Biased Writer Voice13.0%This article: 5.9%Lauren Miller: 1.9%The Barbed Wire: 2.1%Indoctrination5.9%This article: 6.3%Lauren Miller: 2.3%The Barbed Wire: 3.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Lauren Miller: 0.0%The Barbed Wire: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Lauren Miller: 0.2%The Barbed Wire: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.1%

1043 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers5.0%attributed speech991writer words
Selected voice

Ken Paxton

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words71% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+59.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ken Paxton: 59.5%59.5%Biased Writer Voice-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Ken Paxton: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Ken Paxton: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Ken Paxton: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Ken Paxton: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Ken Paxton: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.