Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Bans results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 6,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,622 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (9,812 of 22,440 topics). This Abortion Bans is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Abortion Bans
Topic details
Total words: 5,622
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos