Author summary
85% 4 analyzed articles/videos 570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Channa Steinmetz results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 308 hits . Analysis detected 2,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,955 of 8,788 authors). This Channa Steinmetz is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Channa Steinmetz
Author details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst