Collins’ anti-reproductive rights record extends far beyond Kavanaugh vote 67%

By Channa Steinmetz83%

8/5/2026, 11:46:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 437 faulty-reasoning hits from 319 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (9,149 of 27,670 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the article peer group.

One of Sen. 
Susan Collins’ most infamous votes was her 2018 decision to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who played a key role in overturning Roe v. 
Wade. 
But Collins, who has claimed to be a “pro-choice” Republican, has made several other decisive votes against reproductive rights. 
After a draft Supreme Court opinion revealed that the Court was poised to overturn Roe v. 
Wade in 2022, Collins still voted against the Women’s Health Protection Act, a bill that would have codified abortion protections into federal law . 
The vote came after Collins had helped confirm Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, three of the five justices who ultimately voted to overturn Roe in Dobbs v. 
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. 
Before voting to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, Collins said she believed they viewed Roe as settled precedent and would not vote to overturn it. 
Both justices had previously established records opposing abortion rights and were supported by conservative legal groups that had made overturning Roe a central goal. 
Collins’ Senate record also includes numerous votes supporting anti-abortion judicial nominees, Cabinet officials and legislation. 
She voted to confirm at least 43 federal judges nominated by Pres. 
Donald Trump who had records opposing abortion rights. 
Among them were judges who supported fetal personhood policies and restrictions on abortion and contraception access. 
Her legislative record includes votes to eliminate federal funding for Planned Parenthood, support abortion funding restrictions through the Hyde and Dornan amendments, and advance Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” despite warnings that it would reduce access to health care services , including reproductive care. 
Less than two months after the bill became law, Maine reproductive health providers said many patients would soon lose access to primary care because of the changes. 
The post Collins’ anti-reproductive rights record extends far beyond Kavanaugh vote first appeared on Maine Beacon . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.7%Channa Steinmetz: 6.8%Maine Beacon: 5.6%Confirmation Bias25.7%This article: 7.8%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Anchoring Bias7.8%This article: 8.5%Channa Steinmetz: 2.0%Maine Beacon: 3.2%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.4%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 15.0%Channa Steinmetz: 3.9%Maine Beacon: 1.0%Hindsight Bias15.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.2%Maine Beacon: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Channa Steinmetz: 7.4%Maine Beacon: 9.3%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 2.4%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.0%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.2%Maine Beacon: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.8%Maine Beacon: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.3%Channa Steinmetz: 4.0%Maine Beacon: 10.2%Negativity Bias26.3%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 2.1%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 7.6%Maine Beacon: 4.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 6.1%Maine Beacon: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.8%Maine Beacon: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 2.4%Maine Beacon: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.0%Maine Beacon: 2.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.7%Maine Beacon: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.2%Channa Steinmetz: 3.0%Maine Beacon: 6.2%Hasty Generalization18.2%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.3%Maine Beacon: 1.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 4.8%Maine Beacon: 13.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 7.5%Channa Steinmetz: 0.5%Maine Beacon: 1.2%Begging the Question7.5%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.6%Maine Beacon: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.1%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.5%Channa Steinmetz: 1.2%Maine Beacon: 3.3%Anecdotal8.5%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.5%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.8%Channa Steinmetz: 1.6%Maine Beacon: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice13.8%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 5.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 2.8%Channa Steinmetz: 5.7%Maine Beacon: 10.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.2%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

319 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker8.5%attributed speech292writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words100% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.1 ptsWriter: 15.1%Maine reproductive health providers: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Maine reproductive health providers: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.