Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Judicial Nominations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 3,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Nominations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Judicial Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos