Years after Roe v. Wade overturned, Collins still doesn’t regret Kavanaugh vote 77%

By Channa Steinmetz83%

6/17/2026, 3:13:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 404 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (6,473 of 27,670 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the article peer group.

Sen. 
Susan Collins said she does not regret voting to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, despite his role in overturning the federal right to abortion. 
In an interview with News Center Maine, Collins said she was “disappointed” by Kavanaugh’s vote in the 2022 Dobbs decision, but maintained she stands by her 2018 vote to confirm him after saying at the time that she believed he would not help overturn Roe v. 
Wade. 
Collins’ vote was widely seen as pivotal to securing Kavanaugh's confirmation. 
Conservative and MAGA radio host John Fredericks said earlier this month that Collins is “with us the overwhelming majority of the time. 
She saved the Kavanaugh nomination single-handedly.” 
The comments come after previous reporting revealing that she has not attended Senate committee hearings focused on abortion or reproductive health care since the Dobbs ruling. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 48.0%Channa Steinmetz: 6.8%Maine Beacon: 5.6%Confirmation Bias48.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Channa Steinmetz: 2.0%Maine Beacon: 3.2%Availability Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.4%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 3.9%Maine Beacon: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.2%Maine Beacon: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 5.3%Channa Steinmetz: 7.4%Maine Beacon: 9.3%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 2.4%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 30.7%Channa Steinmetz: 1.0%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Status Quo Bias30.7%This article: 16.7%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect16.7%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.2%Maine Beacon: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.8%Maine Beacon: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.7%Channa Steinmetz: 4.0%Maine Beacon: 10.2%Negativity Bias22.7%This article: 16.7%Channa Steinmetz: 2.1%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias16.7%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Channa Steinmetz: 7.6%Maine Beacon: 4.1%In-Group Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Channa Steinmetz: 6.1%Maine Beacon: 1.7%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 17.3%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 1.4%Recency Bias17.3%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.8%Maine Beacon: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 2.4%Maine Beacon: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.0%Maine Beacon: 2.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.7%Maine Beacon: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.3%Channa Steinmetz: 3.0%Maine Beacon: 6.2%Hasty Generalization7.3%This article: 17.3%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.3%Red Herring17.3%This article: 14.7%Channa Steinmetz: 1.3%Maine Beacon: 1.7%Bandwagon14.7%This article: 17.3%Channa Steinmetz: 4.8%Maine Beacon: 13.1%Appeal to Emotion17.3%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.5%Maine Beacon: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.6%Maine Beacon: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.1%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Composition/Division4.0%This article: 4.0%Channa Steinmetz: 1.2%Maine Beacon: 3.3%Anecdotal4.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.5%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.3%Channa Steinmetz: 1.6%Maine Beacon: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice17.3%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 5.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 5.7%Maine Beacon: 10.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Channa Steinmetz: 0.2%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

150 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers66%attributed speech51writer words
Selected voice

John Fredericks

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words28% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-51.0 ptsWriter: 51.0%John Fredericks: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.