Speaker summary
72% 27 analyzed articles/videos 1,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Paxton results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Self-Serving Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 260.862 hits . Analysis detected 3,708.976 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,991 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,951 of 28,364 speakers). This Ken Paxton is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Ken Paxton
Speaker details
Total words: 1,991
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score27 analyzed videos2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Straw Man: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst