Publication summary
51% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miami New Times results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,503 hits . Analysis detected 12,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,504 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (336 of 556 publications). This Miami New Times is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 20,504
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst