Author summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Lopez-Alvar results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 2,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (3,323 of 8,807 authors). This Nicole Lopez-Alvar is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Nicole Lopez-Alvar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠63%Nicole Lopez-Alvar (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos