Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Osvaldo Espino results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 885 hits . Analysis detected 2,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,370 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,548 of 6,359 authors). This Osvaldo Espino is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Osvaldo Espino
Author details
Total words: 2,370
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 37.3% 37.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 20.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst