Author summary
27% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Destenie Nock results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,146 hits . Analysis detected 4,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (6,874 of 8,807 authors). This Destenie Nock is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Destenie Nock
Author details
Total words: 9,148
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst