Manosphere plans Miami jail protest for Tate brothers 61%

By B. Scott McLendon74%

7/31/2026, 7:28:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 880 faulty-reasoning hits from 375 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.7% and a BS Rank of 61% (10,876 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the article peer group.

Hide your wives, hide your sisters, and basically every woman you care about  because self-proclaimed Miami alpha males are planning to descend upon downtown to protest (checks notes) the detainment of men accused of serial rape and sex trafficking. 
Former professional kickboxers-turned influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate returned to international headlines July 18 when U.S. 
Marshals in Miami arrested the brothers in connection to new criminal charges in the U.K. 
Since then, Andrew has used X to complain about what he describes as a wrongful arrest and poor jail conditions  claims about the conditions have been corroborated in part by other sources  while urging supporters to rally ahead of the brothers’ Aug. 13 bail hearing. 
Tate brothers representative and attorney Joe McBride appeared this week on the Fresh and Fit podcast, hosted by fellow manosphere influencers Walter Weekes and Myron Gaines (whom you may recognize from the viral “Hail Hitler” video with Clavicular). 
When asked what people could do to help the men, who face allegations of rape and sex trafficking, McBride says, “No. 1, don’t be afraid to speak about this at your dinner table, your friends at work, your friends online. 
The Constitution applies to everyone or it applies to no one. 
” 
After initially announcing the wrong hearing date (which someone off-screen promptly corrected), McBride continues, “So come out Aug. 
13. 
There’s a crowd right there formulating. 
We had about 15 people out there today on the corner of NE First and NE Fifth streets; that’s where the brothers can see from their cell. 
” 
Both Andrew and Tristan face a total of 59 criminal charges across the pond, including 38 new charges presented over the weekend by the U.K. 
Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). 
While the DOJ’s U.S. 
Marshals handled the arrest for CPS, neither department has responded to New Times’ requests to produce an arrest affidavit. 
Andrew’s 42 charges include rape, arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, controlling prostitution for gain, and 19 counts of offenses relating to indecent images of a child and extreme pornography. 
Tristan’s 17 charges include sexual assault, rape, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.5%B. Scott McLendon: 3.5%Miami New Times: 1.6%Confirmation Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.5%Miami New Times: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%B. Scott McLendon: 2.6%Miami New Times: 2.1%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 6.7%B. Scott McLendon: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%B. Scott McLendon: 0.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 14.7%B. Scott McLendon: 10.0%Miami New Times: 3.6%Framing Effect14.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.7%B. Scott McLendon: 2.3%Miami New Times: 1.4%Optimism Bias10.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 33.9%B. Scott McLendon: 14.3%Miami New Times: 7.3%Negativity Bias33.9%This article: 7.2%B. Scott McLendon: 0.4%Miami New Times: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.6%Miami New Times: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%B. Scott McLendon: 1.6%Miami New Times: 0.7%In-Group Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 3.3%Miami New Times: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 2.6%Miami New Times: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%B. Scott McLendon: 1.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Recency Bias9.1%This article: 10.1%B. Scott McLendon: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 4.7%Miami New Times: 1.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.0%Miami New Times: 2.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.9%B. Scott McLendon: 0.5%Miami New Times: 0.7%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.5%Miami New Times: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.6%B. Scott McLendon: 2.3%Miami New Times: 1.6%Hasty Generalization1.6%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.8%Miami New Times: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.7%B. Scott McLendon: 2.9%Miami New Times: 1.0%Bandwagon10.7%This article: 20.8%B. Scott McLendon: 5.7%Miami New Times: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion20.8%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.0%Miami New Times: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 15.7%B. Scott McLendon: 3.1%Miami New Times: 1.2%Burden of Proof15.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.2%B. Scott McLendon: 1.3%Miami New Times: 4.0%Anecdotal7.2%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%B. Scott McLendon: 0.2%Miami New Times: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.7%Miami New Times: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 3.2%Miami New Times: 3.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 10.1%B. Scott McLendon: 0.6%Miami New Times: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection10.1%This article: 20.8%B. Scott McLendon: 11.0%Miami New Times: 5.3%Biased Writer Voice20.8%This article: 10.7%B. Scott McLendon: 1.6%Miami New Times: 3.9%Indoctrination10.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.2%Miami New Times: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

375 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker28%attributed speech271writer words
Selected voice

Joe McBride

98%flagged-word coverage
104 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination+38.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Joe McBride: 38.5%38.5%Biased Writer Voice-28.8 ptsWriter: 28.8%Joe McBride: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-14.0 ptsWriter: 14.0%Joe McBride: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.