Publication summary
91% 418 analyzed articles/videos 160,984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FoxBusiness results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 103,604 hits . Analysis detected 956,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 795,027 analyzed words across 418 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 60% (153 of 379 publications). This FoxBusiness is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. FoxBusiness
Publication details
Total words: 795,027
Article count: 418
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score418 analyzed articles795K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst