Publication summary
9% 20 analyzed articles/videos 15,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Worth Report results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 3,575 hits . Analysis detected 24,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,416 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 8% (512 of 556 publications). This Fort Worth Report is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 65,416
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 0.8% BS Score20 analyzed articles65.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst