Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Innovate Fort Worth results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Bandwagon , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 304 hits . Analysis detected 1,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,551 of 8,828 authors). This Innovate Fort Worth is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Innovate Fort Worth
Author details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 25.0% 25.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 25.0%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst