Author summary
8%1 analyzed article/video687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denise M. Kahn results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 905 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,312 of 8,828 authors). This Denise M. Kahn is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Denise M. Kahn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
40%Denise M. Kahn (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 8.6%8.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos