Author summary
41%6 analyzed articles/videos1,614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obituary results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,576 hits. Analysis detected 5,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,048 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,583 of 8,818 authors). This Obituary is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Obituary
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
60%Obituary (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,048
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 17.4%17.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate