Publication summary
48%318 analyzed articles/videos173,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CBC results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 49,618 hits. Analysis detected 636,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 876,398 analyzed words across 317 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 20% (300 of 371 publications). This CBC is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
CBC
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
1%Berkeleyside1%
2%The Advocate1%
20%CBC (selected)2%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score317 analyzed articles876.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate