Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joy SpearChief-Morris results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 274 hits . Analysis detected 1,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,861 of 6,163 authors). This Joy SpearChief-Morris is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Joy SpearChief-Morris
Author details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst