Keyword summary
68% 34 analyzed articles/videos 28,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 8,606 hits . Analysis detected 101,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 131,935 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,451 of 36,716 keywords). This Wildlife is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Wildlife
Keyword details
Total words: 131,935
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score34 analyzed articles131.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst