Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Siebrase results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,075 hits . Analysis detected 3,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,102 of 6,359 authors). This Jamie Siebrase is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Jamie Siebrase
Author details
Total words: 5,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 21.4% 21.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Indoctrination: Author 21.4%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst