Keyword summary
34% 11 analyzed articles/videos 5,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whatsapp results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 2,393 hits . Analysis detected 19,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,254 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,935 of 37,536 keywords). This Whatsapp is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Whatsapp
Keyword details
Total words: 25,254
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles25.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst