Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Ruwitch results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,984 hits. Analysis detected 12,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,742 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,390 of 6,359 authors). This John Ruwitch is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
John Ruwitch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%John Ruwitch (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,742
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate