Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KELVIN CHAN results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 461 hits . Analysis detected 3,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,826 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,318 of 6,628 authors). This KELVIN CHAN is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. KELVIN CHAN
Author details
Total words: 2,826
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.7% 13.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.8% 15.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst