Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Naisha Roy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,078 hits. Analysis detected 6,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,930 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Naisha Roy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Naisha Roy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Naisha Roy (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,930
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate