Keyword summary
44% 11 analyzed articles/videos 7,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Systems results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,367 hits . Analysis detected 18,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,254 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (53,663 of 58,045 keywords). This Water Systems is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Water Systems
Keyword details
Total words: 31,254
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score11 analyzed articles31.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst