Keyword summary
74% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us House Of Representatives results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,746 hits . Analysis detected 13,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,759 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,436 of 37,536 keywords). This Us House Of Representatives is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Us House Of Representatives
Keyword details
Total words: 10,759
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst