Keyword summary
74%4 analyzed articles/videos2,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us House Of Representatives results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,746 hits. Analysis detected 13,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,759 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,436 of 37,536 keywords). This Us House Of Representatives is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Us House Of Representatives

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate