Author summary
99%3 analyzed articles/videos387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CA Post Editorial Board results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49.2% saturation with 2,064 hits. Analysis detected 10,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,194 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 87% (821 of 6,316 authors). This CA Post Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
CA Post Editorial Board
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%CA Post Editorial Board (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,194
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
6.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 49.2%49.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 28.3%28.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.0%28.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.5%13.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 49.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 28.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 28.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Author 16.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate