Keyword summary
87% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Homan results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 4,651 hits . Analysis detected 47,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,288 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,878 of 34,740 keywords). This Tom Homan is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Tom Homan
Keyword details
Total words: 27,288
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles27.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst