Border Czar Reveals If Pause on ICE Arrest Strategy Will Decrease Deportations 62%

By Elizabeth Mitchell68%

7/14/2026, 3:24:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 854 faulty-reasoning hits from 386 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,342 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.

Border czar Tom Homan promised Tuesday that the pause on U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement performing vehicle stops will not lower the rate of deportations. 
Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin temporarily ordered ICE to cease conducting vehicle stops, causing some members of the MAGA movement to fear the Trump administration is taking its foot off the gas on deportations. 
When asked by the Daily Signal if the pause would slow down the rate of deportations, Homan responded with an emphatic “no.” 
“Let me address that: I’m sick and tired of reading about how the administration has lost their guts with mass deportations,” Homan said. 
NEW: I asked @RealTomHoman if the pause on vehicle stops will lower the rate of deportations, and he gave an emphatic "NO." 
"Let me address that: I'm sick and tired of reading about how the administration has lost their their guts with mass deportations," he told @DailySignal  pic.twitter.com/N7TBP9ZZjM 
- Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell (@TheElizMitchell) July 14, 2026 
Homan said that ICE arrested a record number of illegal aliens in June. 
“So, you know, people say ICE is not serious about this job. 
Last month, [we had] the most aliens arrested in the history of the agency—more than last year, more than when you had the FBI, ATF, DEA, Border Patrol, and ICE all out there.” 
He said deportation numbers dropped temporarily due to the Department of Homeland Security shutdown, which lasted from mid-February until the end of April. 
“Bottom line is, once we got the funding, numbers are going through the ceiling, like President [Donald] Trump promised Americans,” Homan said. 
The temporary pause on vehicle stops resulted from two ICE-involved shootings in Maine and Texas. 
ICE officers fatally shot a 26-year-old Colombian as they were trying to pull over his vehicle in Biddeford, Maine. 
Last Tuesday, an ICE officer fatally shot Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, during a vehicle stop in Houston, Texas. 
Homan said he is reviewing the “extensive” training curriculum for vehicle stops. 
“I think what they’re doing is taking a pause to make sure that ICE officers have everything they need to stay safe, because vehicle attacks are up 3,400%,” he said. 
“And they’re going to make sure if the training is sufficient.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.8%Elizabeth Mitchell: 2.2%Daily Signal: 6.2%Confirmation Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.8%Elizabeth Mitchell: 8.1%Daily Signal: 3.1%Availability Heuristic16.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Elizabeth Mitchell: 8.7%Daily Signal: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias12.2%This article: 3.1%Elizabeth Mitchell: 6.9%Daily Signal: 8.5%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Elizabeth Mitchell: 3.6%Daily Signal: 1.2%Optimism Bias8.5%This article: 6.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 1.5%Daily Signal: 1.3%Pessimism Bias6.0%This article: 35.5%Elizabeth Mitchell: 8.9%Daily Signal: 9.1%Negativity Bias35.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 6.9%Daily Signal: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Elizabeth Mitchell: 4.5%Daily Signal: 3.4%In-Group Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Elizabeth Mitchell: 3.0%Daily Signal: 1.3%Recency Bias11.9%This article: 5.7%Elizabeth Mitchell: 1.4%Daily Signal: 0.5%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 3.2%Daily Signal: 3.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 4.0%Daily Signal: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%Elizabeth Mitchell: 4.3%Daily Signal: 4.6%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 2.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.9%Elizabeth Mitchell: 5.7%Daily Signal: 9.4%Hasty Generalization11.9%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 2.1%Daily Signal: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.7%Elizabeth Mitchell: 10.4%Daily Signal: 7.2%Appeal to Emotion20.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 2.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.3%Elizabeth Mitchell: 7.3%Daily Signal: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.3%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.8%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.7%Daily Signal: 1.3%Burden of Proof2.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.6%Elizabeth Mitchell: 2.7%Daily Signal: 2.5%Anecdotal10.6%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.7%Daily Signal: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 1.5%Daily Signal: 2.7%Unattributed Quote6.0%This article: 11.4%Elizabeth Mitchell: 6.0%Daily Signal: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection11.4%This article: 11.1%Elizabeth Mitchell: 2.8%Daily Signal: 9.7%Biased Writer Voice11.1%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 4.5%Daily Signal: 10.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Mitchell: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

386 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers77%attributed speech90writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 11 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 35 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 22 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 27 words • 0.0% coverageElizabeth Troutman Mitchell • 8 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 33 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Markwayne Mullin

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words12% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Markwayne Mullin: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-24.4 ptsWriter: 24.4%Markwayne Mullin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.