Keyword summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 7,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Things To Do In St Louis results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 2,559 hits . Analysis detected 25,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,223 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,994 of 37,536 keywords). This Things To Do In St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Things To Do In St Louis
Keyword details
Total words: 33,223
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles33.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
STLPR 0% 6/15/2026, 3:00:00 AM