What you need to know ahead of Soulard Mardi Gras celebrations in St. Louis this weekend91%

By Katie Grawitch0%

2/13/2026, 5:42:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Red Herring, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 68.3% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 1,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 614 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,174 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the article peer group.

When I was a student at Arizona State University almost 15 years ago, I helped film a massive event on campus known as the Origins Symposium, a science-focused discussion series led by the well-known physicist Lawrence Krauss and attended by thousands. 
Years later, I’d come to see Krauss’ name all over the Jeffrey Epstein files, in emails showing that he maintained ties to Epstein several years after the latter pleaded guilty to sex crimes. 
For me, that revelation showed the extent of Epstein’s ties to academia and how he used them to maintain influence when he should have been a pariah. 
And the fallout in academia over the Epstein files continues. 
As The New York Times reported earlier this week, some of the recently released files show how Epstein pulled strings behind the scenes in 2012 to get his then-girlfriend admitted to Columbia University’s dental school after she’d been rejected. 
(The revelation raises fresh questions for me about the creepy dentist’s chair Epstein had on his private island.) 
Columbia University fessed up to the special treatment in a statement on Wednesday: 
In short, a student was admitted to the dental school through an irregular process, coinciding with fundraising solicitations by former academic and alumni leadership of the school. 
The fundraising discussions were undertaken by the then leadership of the dental school or individuals acting at their behest and not at the direction of the leadership of the medical center or the University. 
To be clear: the matters discussed in these communications do not meet Columbia’s standards for integrity and independence in admissions. 
Columbia isn’t the only university coming to terms with its ties to Epstein. 
The outlet Inside Higher Ed, for example, listed nine professors and faculty members whose ties to Epstein prompted recent statements from several universities, including Harvard and Yale. 
At Ohio State University, a professor was put on leave for wrestling a documentary filmmaker to the ground after the filmmaker sought to ask the university’s former president about OSU’s Epstein connections. 
The former president, a man named E. Gordon Gee, recently decried efforts to remove billionaire Les Wexner’s name from university buildings because of his close relationship with Epstein  efforts Gee called “cancel culture.” 
Needless to say, the revelations from the Epstein files are sending tremors throughout college and university campuses. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.4%Katie Grawitch: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias11.4%This article: 17.1%Katie Grawitch: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias17.1%This article: 4.7%Katie Grawitch: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 15.6%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias15.6%This article: 4.4%Katie Grawitch: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.4%This article: 42.6%Katie Grawitch: 8.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect42.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 68.3%Katie Grawitch: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias68.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem8.8%This article: 8.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man8.8%This article: 17.1%Katie Grawitch: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority17.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.4%Katie Grawitch: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization11.4%This article: 21.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring21.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.1%Katie Grawitch: 6.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion9.1%This article: 7.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question7.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal13.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

385 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.