Keyword summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Blues results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 898 hits . Analysis detected 4,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,601 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,477 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Blues is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. St Louis Blues
Keyword details
Total words: 3,601
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 49% 7/12/2026, 5:36:57 PM