Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marissanne Lewis-Thompson results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 5,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,429 of 6,628 authors). This Marissanne Lewis-Thompson is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Marissanne Lewis-Thompson
Author details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.3% 15.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.8% 11.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.1% 6.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst