Keyword summary
18%6 analyzed articles/videos5,654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Singapore results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,226 hits. Analysis detected 12,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,312 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,291 of 37,536 keywords). This Singapore is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Singapore
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
9%Singapore (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate