Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Seifert results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 630 hits . Analysis detected 4,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,071 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,207 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel Seifert is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Daniel Seifert
Author details
Total words: 4,071
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.5% 15.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.0%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst