Keyword summary
79% 17 analyzed articles/videos 9,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Wiener results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 7,296 hits . Analysis detected 72,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,924 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (26,208 of 34,315 keywords). This Scott Wiener is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Scott Wiener
Keyword details
Total words: 69,924
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score17 analyzed articles69.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst