Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Joe Eskenazi results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,013 hits . Analysis detected 15,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Joe Eskenazi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Joe Eskenazi
Author details
Total words: 16,248
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst