Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Joe Eskenazi results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,013 hits. Analysis detected 15,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Joe Eskenazi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Joe Eskenazi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Joe Eskenazi (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 16,248
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos