Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Santa Barbara results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 3,152 hits. Analysis detected 16,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,536 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,561 of 37,536 keywords). This Santa Barbara is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate