Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marsha Takeda-Morrison results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 2,973 hits . Analysis detected 12,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,527 of 6,362 authors). This Marsha Takeda-Morrison is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Marsha Takeda-Morrison
Author details
Total words: 10,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 29.4% 29.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.1% 21.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 29.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst