Keyword summary
11% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican Nomination results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,086 hits . Analysis detected 8,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (33,948 of 36,185 keywords). This Republican Nomination is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Republican Nomination
Keyword details
Total words: 13,888
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst