Keyword summary
95% 14 analyzed articles/videos 5,614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regime Change results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 6,077 hits . Analysis detected 53,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,240 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (14,260 of 34,040 keywords). This Regime Change is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Regime Change
Keyword details
Total words: 31,240
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst