Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David McAfee results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 602 hits . Analysis detected 3,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (544 of 6,169 authors). This David McAfee is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group. David McAfee
Author details
Total words: 1,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.2% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 23.8% 23.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 33.3% 33.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.1% 17.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 33.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 23.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Tu Quoque: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.7%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst